With the recent release of The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development, it is an opportune moment to reflect on the future of global mental health. This post begins by describing the Commission’s agenda and proceeds to offer reflections on communication and partnership in this field.
Over the past year, particularly since Dr Tedros’ election as the Director-General of the World Health Organisation, there has also been a large focus on the development of countries’ Primary Healthcare (PHC) systems. This post offers reflections on Astana Conference, on PHC and the missed opportunity with emergency preparedness.
When the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa struck, millions of concerned citizens from around the world wanted to read up on the disease. A staggering 17m readers a month consulted the Ebola page on Wikipedia[i]. If Wikipedia is becoming increasingly important for public health, should university students start editing it?
Last week, a few of us global health students and researchers at the University of Edinburgh got together to watch the live-streaming of the Women Leaders in Global Health (WLGH) 2018 Conference held at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. In this post, we present 6 tips on leadership, emerging from this conference.
Very few research centres study Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and Global Health Security (GHS) at the same time. I share my reflections on the Achieving Global Health Security workshop held in Edinburgh in May this year, jointly organised by the Global Health Governance Programme at the University of Edinburgh and the Centre for Global Health Science and Security at Georgetown University.
The rise of new economic powers since the post-1945 creation of the Bretton Woods institutions – including the establishment of the World Bank in 1944 and World Health Organisation (WHO) in 1948 – has caused a paradigm shift in global health. There are growing calls to reform global governance structures to better reflect global realities. What implications do the changing nature of global governance arrangements have for global health diplomacy?
“What if governments had a proven, cost-effective way to save babies’ lives, reduce rates of malnutrition, support children’s health, increase educational attainment and grow productivity? They do: It’s called breastfeeding. And it is one of the best investments nations can make in the lives and futures of their youngest members – and in the long-term strength of their societies.”
The leading voices of global health policy are primarily drawn from a small, closely connected network of mostly Western, mostly male perspectives. In fact, in the last four issues of the Lancet (May 26- June 16, 2018) the authors of commentaries were predominantly male, white, trained and working in a European or American institution, and in a senior position. We see a similar pattern amongst experts quoted in media articles related to health security.[i],[ii] These experts have distinguished careers, and shape ongoing debates, dialogues and policies. While respecting these voices and experiences, we must also make room in ongoing debates for a more diverse community of scholars and practitioners…
The high-level meeting “Health Systems for Prosperity and Solidarity: leaving no one behind” has a theme – include, invest, innovate. “Include” means improving coverage, access and financial protection for everyone, “invest” refers to making the case for investing in health systems, and, lastly, “innovate” is about harnessing innovations and systems to meet people’s needs
What is human capital? According to a World Bank publication promoted at its recent Spring Meeting, human capital is “measured as the discounted value of earnings over a person’s lifetime” (Lange et al. 2018: 4). In its explicitly economistic nature, “human capital” is not the same as “human development”…
“Between a high, solid wall and an egg that breaks against it, I will always stand on the side of the egg… Each of us is, more or less, an egg. Each of us is a unique, irreplaceable soul enclosed in a fragile shell. This is true of me, and it is true of each of you. And each of us, to a greater or lesser degree, is confronting a high, solid wall. The wall has a name: It is The System. The System is supposed to protect us, but sometimes it takes on a life of its own…”
Haruki Murakami, 2009
How do we measure the impact of health interventions and how does the measurement of health or of health’s absence impact global health discourse and funding? How is the measuring of health co-constructive of ideas about what health is and what kinds of negotiations are underway in health development in Senegal as the country works towards universal health coverage?
By Devi Sridhar
Our BMJ series on the World Bank has just been published. This reflects the first year of work of our larger project on the World Bank in global health and robust collaboration among team members at the Global Health Governance Programme.
So why should we care about the World Bank in global health?
From its first foray into health in the early 1970s to the present, the Bank has transformed into one of the largest health funders worldwide, with an incredibly influential impact on the entire health landscape. 2017 is a particularly important time to examine the workings of the World Bank in global health: for the first time in its history, the re-elected President Jim Yong Kim is a medical doctor, activist and anthropologist who has argued for the right to health. Throughout his tenure, the Bank has moved towards innovative financing for health through new modalities such as financing facilities.
What do our papers cover?
In this five paper series, we provide an overview of the Bank’s evolving role in global health, documenting its turn towards innovative financing in health and critically analyzing the benefits and risks of such a shift to achieving health goals.
Paper 1: We present detailed analysis of the World Bank’s financing, priorities and lending structures for global health.
Paper 2: We examine the universal health coverage and health systems strengthening agenda and critically assess the Bank’s history in this area and future directions.
Paper 3: We discuss the growth, benefits, and risks of earmarked aid for global health at the Bank and provide a detailed case study of onchocerciasis trust funds, which supported the Bank’s first flagship health project.
Paper 4: We look at global efforts to achieve maternal, newborn and child health by examining the Global Financing Facility.
Paper 5: We scope global efforts towards pandemic preparedness and analyze the Bank’s involvement in health outbreaks and emergencies through its currently proposed Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility.
You can find all the papers and abstracts here
What sources were used in the analysis?
We base our analysis on World Bank official documents and reports from its website, sources from the World Bank archives, secondary literature on the World Bank and conversations with numerous Bank staff working in the Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) sector.
Is there supporting material?
Who funded the research?
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Wellcome Trust, grant 106635/Z/14/Z. We have received no funding support from the World Bank. Full COI statements are available at the end of each paper.